Training dogs in Singapore has experienced a notable metamorphosis since the inception of the AVS-Accredited Certified Dog Trainer (ACDT) Scheme. This program, devised by the Animal and Veterinary Service (AVS), strives to enhance the benchmarks in the field, guaranteeing that techniques for instructing dogs are grounded in scientific principles and executed with minimal use of harsh or negative methods.
Governing the Training of Dogs in Singapore
In Singapore, the realm of dog instruction, akin to the segregated approaches in the United States, mirrors a blend of conventional and contemporary dog’s training techniques. Fraser Noble from Noble Canine commends the state’s effort with the ACDT program, substituting the antiquated Panel for the Certification of Canine Instructors (PCCI). Authorized instructors are required to keep current with the most recent positive reinforcement training approaches, augmenting the general standard of canine instruction.
The AVS-Accredited Certified Dog Trainer (ACDT) Scheme in Singapore has elevated industry standards, emphasizing scientifically backed and humane training methods. By discouraging harsh practices, the scheme fosters a positive environment for both trainers and dogs. It has garnered support within the dog training community and gained recognition from pet owners seeking trustworthy and ethical training for their beloved pets.
Changes in Mentality and Education
The transition to noncoercive teaching dog’s techniques in Singapore has been characterized as a sudden, sweeping shift by Fraser Noble. The outbreak impacted this alteration, as animal guardians had additional time to scrutinize customary teaching approaches, sourcing knowledge via social networking and other instructional venues. Fraser emphasized the significance of well-informed selections and conveyed hope that individuals will gravitate towards certified instructors employing current methodologies.
Responses from Local Dog Trainers
Dog trainers in Singapore have responded differently to the ACDT scheme. While some are enthusiastic about upgrading themselves with formal certifications, others find the new accreditation process more challenging. June Lim, an AVS-accredited trainer, welcomes the ACDT scheme, emphasizing the positive impact on both new and existing trainers. However, she acknowledges that the accreditation is voluntary, allowing some trainers to continue without undergoing the scheme.
Challenges and Considerations
Ricky Yeo, an experienced dog trainer, acknowledges the challenges of the ACDT accreditation process but sees its positive impact. Some trainers, particularly those accustomed to traditional methods, might struggle with adaptation. Language barriers and English requirements for exams and assessments add to the challenges. Despite these hurdles, the two-year grace period and continuous education initiatives strive to encourage trainers to adopt science-based methods.
When dog trainer resort to punishment as a method of dog training, several negative consequences can occur. Firstly, punishment-based techniques can lead to fear and anxiety in dogs, damaging the bond between the trainer and the canine. The dog may associate training sessions with negative experiences, hindering the learning process and causing stress.
Outdated Training Methods of Dog Trainer
Dog’s trainers using traditional methods, rooted in punishment and dominance, may resist the transition to positive reinforcement. Ricky Yeo suggests that some trainers are stuck in their ways, opting for aversive methods due to familiarity or resistance to change. Anna Koo of Mutt Matters explains the limitations of punishment-based training, emphasizing its suppressive effects on behavior without addressing the underlying emotions or reasons for a dog’s actions.
Understanding Animal Learning
Anna Koo sheds light on the importance of understanding how animals learn, distinguishing between operant conditioning and classical conditioning. She explains the ABC model (antecedent-behavior-consequence) in animal training, highlighting the need for a sound education to avoid unintentional harm to dogs. Conflicting information on the internet adds complexity for dog owners, underscoring the importance of relying on science-backed methodologies.
Conclusion
The ACDT scheme has marked a positive shift in Singapore’s dog training industry, fostering a focus on animal welfare and science-based methods. Despite challenges, the ongoing transformation indicates a commitment to providing dogs with positive, effective, and humane training experiences. As Singapore continues to raise standards, informed choices and adherence to accredited trainers are crucial for the well-being of our canine companions.